I did watch it; the truck was screaming the entire time at 4000+ rpms, tranny temp was very hot etc. And he's not towing 32 gross. That's his GCWR, he's towing about 24k. The jury is still out on whether that truck can take that abuse (it's not rated by the manfufacturer to tow that much, so he's over his limits and possibly other limits like payload too.)
There is a huge difference in engine power between the 2005, and 2015 duramax. And since 2015, the dmax has been bumped up to 910 lb/ft of torque, with the cummins putting out something insane like 1050 lb/ft. That's more than double the output of the 7.3, and it comes on at like 1800 rpms instead of 4000+.
They're comparing their experience in the 7.3 vs other gas engines, not vs a diesel doing the same thing. They literally said that right in the quote: "considering most naturally-aspirated gas". No doubt the 7.3 is currently the most powerful gas puller out there, that wasn't the question though.
No it's not. Truck manufacturers have been one-upping eachother for decades. Today all they care about is the J2807 SAE standard which includes measuresments like 0 to 30, 0 to 60, temperatures while doing it etc. I doubt they even know TFL exists, and if you care about long term ownership you should not drive your truck up the Ike like those guys do. Slow down a little, and use the tech in the truck (like by forcing a downshift if the truck doesn't) etc etc, unless all you care about is beating your buddy up the hill by a few seconds.
Remember the context; we're in a truck thread talking about truck gas vs truck diesel. But just like the FCA 6.4 blocks, if Ford was stuffing the 7.3 in a car they'd get far more power out of it. For truck usage, they always build their gassers for reliability and durability and cooling and low end torque, not light duty car usage. The 6.4 in a 2500 makes far less power than the 6.4 SRT in the cars, and they're actually different engines at this point with different internals as well.