- Joined
- May 19, 2023
- Posts
- 644
- Reaction score
- 947
- Location
- Coastal NE North Carolina
- Ram Year
- 2016 1500 Sport
- Engine
- 5.7 Hemi
Almost, the 340 six pack and 360 were both odd balls. The 340-6 being odd (and sharing the engine w/ the '70 Challanger T/A) for all the good reasons. Aside from bore and stroke being same as std 340, the 340 6 also had the forged crank and rods and a completely different upper ends to make gobbs of high RPM power.Had a 292 MerCruiser in my old Crestliner. That thing was nice and torquey and replaced the original 250 nicely but I had to build a custom cover to clear it since it is a raised block.
Mostly; the 360 was an oddball. Everything top end was swappable but the mains were larger and the cranks were externally balanced (all previous LA were internally balanced) and a longer stroke. 273-318-340 all had the same stroke. 340 just a nice large bore.
Baby 440 would be more accurate. Same CR & cam timing as the 440 Magnum those years (basically 68-71, after that both engines were neutered) with a nice revvable short stroke.
Never owned a 360, but have owned (all pre '72):
272 in a 66 Dart GT
multiple 318's
a couple of 340's
one 340 6 pack (in a 70 AAR Cuda)
a 413 in a 65 Chrysler 300
400 in a Cordoba
426 wedge in a '63 dodge
426 Hemi in a 71 Charger R/T (multiple strip cars w/ 426's)
multiple 440's
440 6 pack in another '71 Charger R/T (had both R/T chargers at the same time. I know, I know.)