Synthetic Oil

Oil of Choice

  • Castrol Syntec/Edge

    Votes: 239 8.5%
  • Royal Purple

    Votes: 330 11.7%
  • AMSOil

    Votes: 406 14.4%
  • Valvoline Synpower

    Votes: 165 5.8%
  • Mobil 1

    Votes: 1,009 35.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 674 23.9%

  • Total voters
    2,823

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
3,108
Reaction score
6,073
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
I dunno guys. I had two pontiacs (1994 grand am and 2004 grand prix), family has had many gm cars and minivans (cavalier, sunbird, transport, montana) and they all had terrible issues; they all (without exception) "shook", for lack of a better term. Cruising down a country road and you had a constant little shimmy which was imperceptible to many but bugged the cr@p out of me.

3 of them also developed a terrible jerking when shifting, infrequent at first but happening more and more as time went on, something about line pressure or a valve that was damaged. These were all 3 speed + overdrive trannies from the 90's to mid 2005's.

I was soooo glad to hop into my mercedes 5 speed in my Jeep GC, though it was tuned poorly (by jeep) to upshift too quickly into 3rd beyond that it was super smooth and never had issues with shaking or jerking. The tuning I could override in "manual mode" so it was not the fault of the transmission, it just needed to hang out longer in 2nd because the pentastar had no bottom end torque when it upshifted too soon in 3rd.

The ZF 8 speed is proof that it can be done right. I don't blame GM's current issues/lawsuits just on high gear count. Isn't Toyota's 10 speed better too?

And beyond that, more gears completely changes towing behaviour. I could never drop down to 4 gears again while towing, not in a gasser anyway, 8 and 10 speeds make towing with gassers quite pleasant. Diesels can get away with lower gear count as they don't need to downshift as often.
 

Stefan N

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2015
Posts
971
Reaction score
1,718
Location
Sweden
Ram Year
2015 Sport
Engine
5,7

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
7,231
Reaction score
18,451
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
I dunno guys. I had two pontiacs (1994 grand am and 2004 grand prix), family has had many gm cars and minivans (cavalier, sunbird, transport, montana) and they all had terrible issues; they all (without exception) "shook", for lack of a better term. Cruising down a country road and you had a constant little shimmy which was imperceptible to many but bugged the cr@p out of me.

3 of them also developed a terrible jerking when shifting, infrequent at first but happening more and more as time went on, something about line pressure or a valve that was damaged. These were all 3 speed + overdrive trannies from the 90's to mid 2005's.

I was soooo glad to hop into my mercedes 5 speed in my Jeep GC, though it was tuned poorly (by jeep) to upshift too quickly into 3rd beyond that it was super smooth and never had issues with shaking or jerking. The tuning I could override in "manual mode" so it was not the fault of the transmission, it just needed to hang out longer in 2nd because the pentastar had no bottom end torque when it upshifted too soon in 3rd.

The ZF 8 speed is proof that it can be done right. I don't blame GM's current issues/lawsuits just on high gear count. Isn't Toyota's 10 speed better too?

And beyond that, more gears completely changes towing behaviour. I could never drop down to 4 gears again while towing, not in a gasser anyway, 8 and 10 speeds make towing with gassers quite pleasant. Diesels can get away with lower gear count as they don't need to downshift as often.

Aren't you just pi$$ed you didn't get a Pontiac Aztec before it killed the division?
 

Burla

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Posts
23,959
Reaction score
47,078
Ram Year
2010 Hemi Reg Cab 4x4
Engine
Hemi
Well this isnt going to end well, maybe I shouldn't post it? Nah... Somehow my 2010 is like the swiss, neutral.

What is the Most Unreliable Ram 1500?​

The most unreliable Ram 1500 years are given below:

  • 1995 Dodge Ram
  • 1996 Dodge Ram
  • 1999 Dodge Ram
  • 2000 Dodge Ram
  • 2001 Dodge Ram
  • 2002 Dodge Ram
  • 2003 Dodge Ram
  • 2004 Dodge Ram
  • 2006 Dodge Ram
  • 2014 Ram 1500
  • 2015 Ram 1500
  • 2016 Ram 1500
  • 2019 Ram 1500
These model years have a lot of recalls and many problems. Therefore, the reliability ratings given by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) are low for these model years.

What Year Ram 1500 Trucks Should I Stay Away from?​

Some Ram 1500 model years are highly reliable, while some model years are not reliable. You should stay away from unreliable model years. However, depending on the generation, Ram 1500 worst years vary.

Each generation Ram 1500 has some unique features and updates. Therefore, people choose a truck for buying depending on the generation type.

You should stay away from the following model years of separate generations:

  • 5th Generation: 2019 Ram 1500
  • 4th Generation: 2014, 2015, 2016 Ram 1500
  • 3rd Generation: 2002-2006 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2nd Generation: 1995, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2001 Dodge Ram 1500.

What Year Ram 1500 is the Most Reliable?​

The most reliable Ram 1500 years are given below:

  • 2024 Ram 1500
  • 2023 Ram 1500
  • 2022 Ram 1500
  • 2021 Ram 1500
  • 2020 Ram 1500
  • 2018 Ram 1500
  • 2017 Ram 1500
  • 2012 Ram 1500
  • 2011 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2009 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2008 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2007 Dodge Ram 1500
 

Hemi395

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Posts
9,086
Reaction score
16,076
Location
Cape Cod MA
Ram Year
2013
Engine
5.7 Hemi
Well this isnt going to end well, maybe I shouldn't post it? Nah... Somehow my 2010 is like the swiss, neutral.

What is the Most Unreliable Ram 1500?​

The most unreliable Ram 1500 years are given below:

  • 1995 Dodge Ram
  • 1996 Dodge Ram
  • 1999 Dodge Ram
  • 2000 Dodge Ram
  • 2001 Dodge Ram
  • 2002 Dodge Ram
  • 2003 Dodge Ram
  • 2004 Dodge Ram
  • 2006 Dodge Ram
  • 2014 Ram 1500
  • 2015 Ram 1500
  • 2016 Ram 1500
  • 2019 Ram 1500
These model years have a lot of recalls and many problems. Therefore, the reliability ratings given by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) are low for these model years.

What Year Ram 1500 Trucks Should I Stay Away from?​

Some Ram 1500 model years are highly reliable, while some model years are not reliable. You should stay away from unreliable model years. However, depending on the generation, Ram 1500 worst years vary.

Each generation Ram 1500 has some unique features and updates. Therefore, people choose a truck for buying depending on the generation type.

You should stay away from the following model years of separate generations:

  • 5th Generation: 2019 Ram 1500
  • 4th Generation: 2014, 2015, 2016 Ram 1500
  • 3rd Generation: 2002-2006 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2nd Generation: 1995, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2001 Dodge Ram 1500.

What Year Ram 1500 is the Most Reliable?​

The most reliable Ram 1500 years are given below:

  • 2024 Ram 1500
  • 2023 Ram 1500
  • 2022 Ram 1500
  • 2021 Ram 1500
  • 2020 Ram 1500
  • 2018 Ram 1500
  • 2017 Ram 1500
  • 2012 Ram 1500
  • 2011 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2009 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2008 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2007 Dodge Ram 1500
Whew 2013 isn't on that list
 

knightjp

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Posts
887
Reaction score
993
Location
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Ram Year
2014
Engine
Hemi 5.7
They could be better.Audi's programming on the same ZF trans is far superior to Chryslers programing
I'm not too sure. Audi is brilliant, however my friend is having issues with his Dual Clutch.
The 8 speed ZF transmission in our Rams have their issues too. I've had a Thermal control valve fail and put water into the transmission. We done a few fluid changes and it still shudders intermittently. Right now, its clear that we need to rebuild or replace the transmission. He said for me to run it till it dies. It's been a few months now. I've done off road trails, long distance highway speeds and stuff, this thing still going on. I'm amazed.
Compare that with other transmissions with similar issues, they die within a couple of months.
 

quickster2

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Posts
440
Reaction score
448
Location
SE Michigan
Ram Year
2015 Ram Laramie 2500 4 X 4
Engine
6.4L
If you are having a tick after using PUP 0w40, then I'm guessing PUP 0w40 isn't the best oil for the application or maybe need to reduce the OCI to 3 -4k.
I would certainly look at Redline 5w30. HPL is also good. Check which gives you a better deal.
When heavy towing I am reducing the OCI going forward. I have 1 more change of PUP & LubeGard on the shelf. I'm also looking at the Castrol Edge Euro formula as well as HPL's Supercar. I used the Castrol Euro 0W40 in my Cayenne S when I had it.
 

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
3,108
Reaction score
6,073
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
Aren't you just pi$$ed you didn't get a Pontiac Aztec before it killed the division?

I wanted a G8 GT sooo bad. The deal killer was no stick shift (at least I couldn't find any). This car didn't have the chance it deserved IMHO, dead after only 2 years and the SS cousin just didn't it do anything for me for reasons I couldn't pin down (but also no stick).
 

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
3,108
Reaction score
6,073
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
When heavy towing I am reducing the OCI going forward. I have 1 more change of PUP & LubeGard on the shelf. I'm also looking at the Castrol Edge Euro formula as well as HPL's Supercar. I used the Castrol Euro 0W40 in my Cayenne S when I had it.

I'd love to see more SuperCar reports while towing, feel free to help us HPL guys out with more UOA's.
 

tjfdesmo

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Posts
2,361
Reaction score
4,345
Location
AZ
Soon you guy's maybe getting a V8 Semi in the States. 770hp and 2.729foot-pound Swedish power ;)

Heavy truck V-8 diesels have been tried in the US many times in the past, and have all failed. They can make ferocious horsepower... for a little while. The only two that were worth a darn were the Mack E9 and the 3408 CAT. The 3408 was known for breaking crankshafts. Pretty much every Cummins attempt was a flop. In marine and stationary applications they all did much better. This excludes the Detroit 2-strokes, which were freaks of nature, and pretty much worked in any configuration.

I know the Scania is all the rage in Europe.
 
Last edited:

Wild one

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Posts
15,747
Reaction score
29,130
Ram Year
14 Sport
Engine
5.7
I'm not too sure. Audi is brilliant, however my friend is having issues with his Dual Clutch.
The 8 speed ZF transmission in our Rams have their issues too. I've had a Thermal control valve fail and put water into the transmission. We done a few fluid changes and it still shudders intermittently. Right now, its clear that we need to rebuild or replace the transmission. He said for me to run it till it dies. It's been a few months now. I've done off road trails, long distance highway speeds and stuff, this thing still going on. I'm amazed.
Compare that with other transmissions with similar issues, they die within a couple of months.
That's not the same transmission.The Audi programing is generally considered to be the best factory ZF programing,you need a good transmission tune on a North American 8 speed to match or beat Audi's factory programing.
The good news is you can tune the 8 speeds in the trucks and cars with-out cracking into or unlocking the pcm,as the tcm is a seperate computor from the pcm
 

Yardbird

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2022
Posts
505
Reaction score
1,142
Location
Western NC
Ram Year
2018
Engine
3.6
The V-8 diesel's downfall was emissions. I owned a Cummins VT-903. It had been hopped up, and ran with the Cats of the day with as much, or more power. I consistently got higher fuel mileage than other engines. The early non-turbo charged V-903 was a loud dog.

I also owned an 8V71 Detroit that leaked, blew out, used, a gallon of oil every 700 miles. It got 3.75 to 4.25 miles per gallon, while being passed under load by everyone.

The 6V and 8V 92 series Detroits were stout engines with improved fuel mileage, but longevity was still a problem. I consistently got 7+ mpg on a 6V92 Detroit, it just wouldn't hold up. They would spin main bearings and crack the block in doing so.

If you know the guy behind you is driving a 3408 Cat, stay out of his way so you don't get run over as he passes. Fuel mileage and longevity was an issue with them also.

The high speed legend drivers of the 1970's drove 1693 series 425 Cats and KTA 600 Cummins.

The two best engines that were made, in my opinion, were 3406E Cats and the 60 Series Detroit.

I know, off topic. Just reminiscing of times long ago..
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
7,231
Reaction score
18,451
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
Heavy truck V-8 diesels have been tried in the US many times in the past, and have all failed. They can make ferocious horsepower... for a little while. The only two that were worth a darn were the Mack E9 and the 3408 CAT. The 3408 was known for breaking crankshafts. Pretty much every Cummins attempt was a flop. In marine and stationary applications they all did much better. This excludes the Detroit 2-strokes, which were freaks of nature, and pretty much worked in any configuration.

I know the Scania is all the rage in Europe.

3208? That series was a cheapo made for government truck service to win lowest-bid auctions. Wasn't it cylinder 7 that always, always overheated and seized the valves?

I was with Mobil back then, they knew better than blame the engine oil for this obvious design defect - lack of coolant flow to cylinder 7.

Reminder - this is a Mobile:

1725031597375.png
 

CanuckRam1313

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2022
Posts
1,455
Reaction score
3,328
Location
Ontario Canada
Ram Year
2023 Warlock SLT
Engine
5.7
Well this isnt going to end well, maybe I shouldn't post it? Nah... Somehow my 2010 is like the swiss, neutral.

What is the Most Unreliable Ram 1500?​

The most unreliable Ram 1500 years are given below:

  • 1995 Dodge Ram
  • 1996 Dodge Ram
  • 1999 Dodge Ram
  • 2000 Dodge Ram
  • 2001 Dodge Ram
  • 2002 Dodge Ram
  • 2003 Dodge Ram
  • 2004 Dodge Ram
  • 2006 Dodge Ram
  • 2014 Ram 1500
  • 2015 Ram 1500
  • 2016 Ram 1500
  • 2019 Ram 1500
These model years have a lot of recalls and many problems. Therefore, the reliability ratings given by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) are low for these model years.

What Year Ram 1500 Trucks Should I Stay Away from?​

Some Ram 1500 model years are highly reliable, while some model years are not reliable. You should stay away from unreliable model years. However, depending on the generation, Ram 1500 worst years vary.

Each generation Ram 1500 has some unique features and updates. Therefore, people choose a truck for buying depending on the generation type.

You should stay away from the following model years of separate generations:

  • 5th Generation: 2019 Ram 1500
  • 4th Generation: 2014, 2015, 2016 Ram 1500
  • 3rd Generation: 2002-2006 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2nd Generation: 1995, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2001 Dodge Ram 1500.

What Year Ram 1500 is the Most Reliable?​

The most reliable Ram 1500 years are given below:

  • 2024 Ram 1500
  • 2023 Ram 1500
  • 2022 Ram 1500
  • 2021 Ram 1500
  • 2020 Ram 1500
  • 2018 Ram 1500
  • 2017 Ram 1500
  • 2012 Ram 1500
  • 2011 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2009 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2008 Dodge Ram 1500
  • 2007 Dodge Ram 1500
Glad I traded in my 19' for my 23' :)
 

tjfdesmo

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Posts
2,361
Reaction score
4,345
Location
AZ
3208? That series was a cheapo made for government truck service to win lowest-bid auctions. Wasn't it cylinder 7 that always, always overheated and seized the valves?

I was with Mobil back then, they knew better than blame the engine oil for this obvious design defect - lack of coolant flow to cylinder 7.

Reminder - this is a Mobile:

View attachment 549792
No, the 3408 was their big truck entry. I know the 3208 was scrap, along with the 9 liter Intertrashional, Detroit 8.2 Fuel Pincher, and various other V-8 medium duty junk.
 

Burla

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Posts
23,959
Reaction score
47,078
Ram Year
2010 Hemi Reg Cab 4x4
Engine
Hemi
My buddy hates his new f250, and I was surprised how much this auto stop sucks, it slammed on the brakes because he drove past a bush, and twice more on a trip across town. Makes all kinds of freaking beeps and warnings he cant read. He paid 80k because he got it in Montana, it is 110 here in CA, and it's a piece of isht.
 
Top